I created MDF file and LDF for one database on SQL server 2000.
I need to create more DNF files on other 5 logical drives for this datanase.
All these logical drives are located in SAN storage configured with RAID10.
Should I create one NDF on each logical drive OR create multiple DNF on each
logical drive?
Which way is better for performance?
Thanks,
Mike
What is DNF files? Is it NDF? Have you monitor your SQL Server to make such
decision?
"Mike Torry" <MikeTorry@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:FDBA14B3-18FC-4723-8D73-08A46ECD921C@.microsoft.com...
>I created MDF file and LDF for one database on SQL server 2000.
> I need to create more DNF files on other 5 logical drives for this
> datanase.
> All these logical drives are located in SAN storage configured with
> RAID10.
> Should I create one NDF on each logical drive OR create multiple DNF on
> each
> logical drive?
> Which way is better for performance?
> Thanks,
|||Hello,
Probably you should be talking about NDF files. Since it is SAN just try
creating the database in a Single Logical drive (1 logical drive for MDF
and another for LDF) and see how database performs. See the I/O queue length
counter in perfmon and seee how well it goes.
If it quue length is always <=1 then you are good. I have the similar
environemnt and I have created database based on this strategy.
I will recommend you to keep the files in multiple drives if you have
multiple controllers running. Otherwise even if you create files
in multiple logical drives you will not get any performance improvements.
Thanks
Hari
"Mike Torry" <MikeTorry@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:FDBA14B3-18FC-4723-8D73-08A46ECD921C@.microsoft.com...
>I created MDF file and LDF for one database on SQL server 2000.
> I need to create more DNF files on other 5 logical drives for this
> datanase.
> All these logical drives are located in SAN storage configured with
> RAID10.
> Should I create one NDF on each logical drive OR create multiple DNF on
> each
> logical drive?
> Which way is better for performance?
> Thanks,
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment